It is an opinion of a matematician-harpsichordist friend of mine: that he 
did, unequivocally.
RT

> Werckmeister never accurately described equal temperament. Neidhart's
> temperament was actually a whole set of temperaments, having in common 
> that
> they were more consonant in the more frequently used keys and less 
> consonant
> in the remoter keys. Not quite equal, then, were they? He had more than 
> two
> dozen of these temperaments, and wanted them flexibly applied. He
> recommended different ones for villages, towns and cities. Only for the
> court did he have an equal temperament in mind.
>
> David
>
>>> The irony of mentioning Werckmeister's temperaments of 1691, is that in
>>> his
>>> 'Paradoxal-Discourse" published posthumously in 1707, his final words on
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 



Reply via email to