Is this thread really lute related?
If not: stop it....
W

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christopher Stetson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Januar 2008 23:23
An: Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Finery & Filth...


And a fine tradition it is!

Great emoticon, BTW.

C.

>>> "Ray Brohinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2008 3:08 pm >>>
Actually, more than a few latter-day Puritan descendents still keep up
the tradition. 8^)

On Jan 4, 2008 3:01 PM, Christopher Stetson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yes, and Puritan ministers apparently often married couples, my 
> ancestors likely among them, who were already pregnant (please forgive

> my logically indefensible, but modernly popular and grammatically 
> expedient shortcut!) or even with children.  However, it must be noted

> that the theory was, to the best of my knowledge, that in the eyes of 
> God the connubial act was what created ("consummated") the marriage, 
> and the church ceremony simply recognized it and made it public.  If 
> the ceremony could take place before the consummation, great.  But if 
> not...
>
>
> >>> "Guy Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2008 2:11 pm >>>
> The Puritans approved, after all, of the practice of "bundling" (at 
> least, they did in colonial Massachusetts, I'm not sure about 
> elsewhere).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Stetson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 10:26 AM
> To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: Finery & Filth...
>
> Hi, all,
> Hey, let's not perpetuate the Victorian myth that the Puritans didn't 
> like sex, and even probably laugh at the occasional bawdy joke.  There

> wouldn't be nearly so many of us Puritan descendants if that were the 
> case! Blasphemy, (which is now, of course, ok!) no, but bawdiness (now

> not ok), yes.  As my Renaissance dance teacher told us way back when, 
> if the ministers and priests were preaching against something, you can

> be pretty sure a lot of people were doing it. Best to all,
> C.
>
>
> >>> Andrew Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2008 8:52 am >>>
> He's going to perform his one man show _Finery and Filth_ at the next 
> Lute Society (UK) meeting on the 19th. Apparently it _contains lyrics 
> not suitable for those of a Puritan disposition_. Sounds like my kind 
> of thing.
>
> Andrew
>
> On 4 Jan 2008, at 13:37, Ron Fletcher wrote:
>
> > I was watching local TV-news last night when there was a feature on 
> > an Elizabethan period performer from Lincolnshire.
> >
> > He has recently discovered a book of 'bawdy drinking-songs' written 
> > by Henry Purcell, a composer we would not readily associate with 
> > this type of music.
> >
> >
> >
> > Dante Ferrara is an early-music performer on cittern and hurdy- 
> > gurdy, which should be of interest to several readers here.  He has 
> > just released a CD
> > Bazimakoo.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.danteferrara.co.uk/
> >
> >
> >
> > One page has several video-clips of his performances, which will 
> > delight I'm sure.
> >
> > There's even one using an open-strung chitaronne.
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW I had not heard of this guy before.  Has he been on this list?
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Wishes
> >
> >
> >
>
> > Ron (UK)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > To get on or off this list see list information at 
> > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to