On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Bernd Haegemann wrote: >> I think this piece is in Saizenay... > > As it seems for the CNRS concordance list > it is in not in Saiz. but in "Livre de Tablature... > which version they print. > So if you have a special doubt, just ask..
My doubts are not special. :-) I got a nice facsimile (#12) from Roman's tombeau site which is from Perrine. Now that I look at it, I see it is quite a different piece. Unfortunately, that is the only one with the name Mezangeau there. Livre de Tablature would be the Denis Gaultier source, which I have a copy of. I'm just trying to figure out what this print out I have is based on. It says Perrine p. 3-4. I'd just like to check the original. Lovely piece for a beginner like me, but I have some questions. In both versions the first measure is just 2 beats and the last measure of the first part is 2 beats. Okay. However, in the print out there is a first and 2nd ending measure which differs in length. I wonder what the Perrine had there. In the Gaultier there are no first and second endings but a 2 beat last bar (of the first section) and the second section is all 4. Isn't this somewhat strange to have a different measure structure in a 2 part piece? I never saw a case like that before. Of course there are some rhythmic flags missing in the first bar of the second section. > Does anyone have a scan of the facsimile of Perrine 1680 p.3-4 > handy that they could send me? > I have a computerized print out version of Perrine that I think > came from Richard Civol's site. I think there might be a mistake or > two and a line is missing from one system so I would like to see > the original. > And are there any other versions of Tombeau de Mezangeau besides > the one in Livre du luth. publ. by Denis Gaultier? > TIA Ed Durbrow Saitama, Japan edurb...@sea.plala.or.jp http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
