Dear Stephen (and all), thanks! I understand, and I think you are right. I just had a little bit too much wine, and a temporary Net depression... Now I am a little ashamed... And everything is ok again... :-)
All the best, Arto On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:59:23 -0500, "Stephen Arndt" <stephenar...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Arto wrote: "Yes, I do know this is an "ad" in vain..., no interest in the > List -- as usual." > > > > Dear Arto, > > > > Please do not assume that lack of response equals lack of interest or > appreciation. I, for one, greatly admire your work and have enjoyed your > videos over and over, and I am quite confident that I am not alone. > Although > time constraints do figure as a factor, in my case at least, the failure to > > respond owes more to an embarrassment over vocabulary. I can state a > personal reaction such as "I liked that," make a comment on performance > such > as "You played that well," or give an opinion on the composition such as > "That was a beautiful piece." For me the problem with such generic comments > > lies in the fact that they apply more or less equally well to most > postings. > When I consider the number of videos posted by Daniel Shoskes or Valéry > Sauvage, or the many fine compositions by Roman Turovsky, to name a few of > the most prolific contributors on our list, I begin to feel stupid saying > the same generic things after the first few times, and so, much to my own > dislike, I end up saying nothing, and I suspect that I am not alone in this > > regard either.So, keep up the good work, and know that the interest, even > if > unexpressed, is there. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Stephen Arndt > > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
