"...gratuitous dissonance..."?

Gary


----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Turovsky" <r.turov...@verizon.net> To: "Ron Andrico" <praelu...@hotmail.com>; <wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>; <gilbert.is...@telenet.be>
Cc: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 7:28 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: New blog post


Ron,
the questions are totally valid, and 98% of modern music is in fact ugly.
This certainly does NOT apply to Gilbert, as his music is neither ugly nor
modern (it is jazz-influenced, and as such has a certainn historicist air to it, and it is certainly not modernist). Jazz-influenced sonorities work well
on lutes, as evinenced by Edin's renditions of Monk for example, or Ivano
Zanenghi's own compositions.
As to purely mordernist sound - it is utterly inappropriate for all lutes in
general, and the baroque lute in particular, as the acoustical  properties
of the instrument tolerate absolutely no gratuitous dissonance and/or
non-traditional methods of producing sound (I had many discussions apropos
with Hans Kockelmans, who has a lot of experience both as a lutenist and an avant-garde composer). Modernism on lutes sounds half-ass at best, and daft
at worst.
Only one modernist idiom has some real potential on lutes, and that is
Minimalism, due to its adherence to consonance and rhythmic interest.
RT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Andrico" <praelu...@hotmail.com>
To: <wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>; <gilbert.is...@telenet.be>
Cc: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 10:05 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: New blog post


  Gilbert, Arto:
  I don't recall having described modern music as 'ugly' nor having
  railed against inventiveness.  My point is just to ask the questions.
  But I will add that the 16th century lute was designed for and excels
  at transparent polyphony and, while modern chordal sounds can work, I
  haven't see much polyphonic writing of new music for the lute.
  Best wishes,
  Ron Andrico
  > Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:26:41 +0300
  > To: gilbert.is...@telenet.be
  > CC: praelu...@hotmail.com; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  > From: wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  > Subject: [LUTE] Re: New blog post
  >
  >
  > Yes Gilbert!
  >
  > And they were really very inventive already in 17th cetury; just take
  a
  > look to La Comete by Gallot:
  >
  >
  http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mus/11_courseLute/GallotsCometeM.pdf
  >
  > Arto
  >
  > On Thu, 5 May 2011 15:21:04 +0200, "Gilbert Isbin"
  > <gilbert.is...@telenet.be> wrote:
  > > Why should a modern voicing sound ugly on a lute. Play Dm11 for
  instance.
  >
  > > Not bad. Gm13/D . What's wrong with it ? Sounds very beautiful to
  me.
  > >
  > > Why shouldn't it be possible to integrate lute techniques in modern
  lute
  > > compositions? Try C9sus4 followed by a bass line, or a single note
  run on
  >
  > > the top voice, or in the middle voice. Sounds pretty ok to me.
  > >
  > > I think people from the 16th century would have a good laugh about
  this
  > > discussion. It was a time in which so many creative things
  happened. New
  > > compositional techniques, new lute techniques, new instruments, ..
  > >
  > > Gilbert.
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > http://users.telenet.be/gilbert.isbin/contents.html
  > >
  > > ----- Original Message -----
  > > From: "Ron Andrico" <praelu...@hotmail.com>
  > > To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:06 PM
  > > Subject: [LUTE] New blog post
  > >
  > >
  > >> To All:
  > >> We have a new blog post raising a few questions about modern music
  on
  > >> the lute - not against the idea, by the way.
  > >> [1]http://mignarda.wordpress.com
  > >> Ron & Donna
  > >> --
  > >>
  > >> References
  > >>
  > >> 1. http://mignarda.wordpress.com/
  > >>
  > >>
  > >> To get on or off this list see list information at
  > >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  > >>
  > >>
  > >> -----
  > >> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
  > >> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
  > >> Versie: 10.0.1209 / Virusdatabase: 1500/3616 - datum van uitgifte:
  > >> 05/04/11
  > >>
  >
  >
  --






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.894 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3616 - Release Date: 05/04/11 11:34:00


Reply via email to