Yes - good points, Thomas.  
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Thomas Schall wrote:

>   I'm with David
> 
>   Just want to add that most of the interpretations are getting "better"
>   (the
> 
>   music sounds better) if we know more about the instrument, the
>   composer, the
> 
>   way it could have been intended to play, but also cultural surrounding
>   like
> 
>   poetry (imagine early renaissance music without Petrach's poetry!), the
>   rooms
> 
>   the music was performed and the audiences.
> 
>   It's not necessary that today's audiences know such details but I am
>   convinced
> 
>   it helps to find a interpretation. And that audiences appreciate the
>   quality.
> 
>   We don't need to know all the effort Donna and Ron are putting into
>   their interpretations to feel they are on the highest level.
> 
>   The "If they have had ... " is reducing because then we would never
>   have had
> 
>   the subtleness and sweetness of the old instruments and the music for
>   them.
> 
>   Thomas
> 
>   Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011, 16.13:21 schrieb David van Ooijen:
> 
>> On 12 July 2011 04:15, <t...@heartistrymusic.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I think that, if the old masters had possessed effects, they would
>   have
> 
>>> used them.
> 
>> 
> 
>> .. and would have written different music which would have utilised
> 
>> these effects. Which is the whole point about HIP: using the means
>   the
> 
>> old had at their disposal to create a sound that could have been in
> 
>> their ears when they wre writing their music.
> 
>> 
> 
>> David
> 
>   --
> 
>   Thomas Schall
> 
>   Doerflistrasse 2
> 
>   CH-6078 Lungern
> 
>   +41 41 678 00 79
> 
>   thomas.sch...@bluewin.ch
> 
>   -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>   ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
> 
>   Betreff: Re: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
> 
>   Datum: Freitag, 15. Juli 2011, 20.20:13
> 
>   Von: Thomas Schall <lauten...@lautenist.de>
> 
>   An: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
> 
>   Kopie: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu, David van Ooijen
>   <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
> 
>   which reminds me on my feelings towards Beethoven's piano sonatas. I
>   couldn't
> 
>   stand them any more ... but then I've heard a concert when they were
>   played on
> 
>   a Hammerklavier - so delicate! I loved it ...
> 
>   The same to Chopin on an old piano instead of the modern Steinways it's
> 
>   usually played.
> 
>   It's like a new world - and I like it.
> 
>   I'm not sure BTW that the old composers would have enjoyed modern
>   instruments.
> 
>   They have had different listening habits and the modern instruments
>   would have
> 
>   felt like visiting a Heavy Metal concert when used to lute music.
> 
>   Thomas
> 
>   Am Dienstag, 12. Juli 2011, 17.09:12 schrieb Martyn Hodgson:
> 
>> Indeed David, and precisely the point I made which launched this
>   round
> 
>> of mails. Once we move away from considerations of historical
>   evidence
> 
>> we quickly get into the realms of mere personal assertion to fit an
> 
>> individual's own preferences which may, or may not, be related to
>   what
> 
>> the Old Ones expected.
> 
>> 
> 
>> The idea that, to take one composer at random, JS Bach would have
> 
>> preferred a modern Bechstein grand is, of course, not new and this
>   sort
> 
>> of case was used from the earliest days of the revival of interest in
> 
>> his music in the mid 19th century. Whether or not he would have done
>   is
> 
>> something we'll never know - what we do know reasonably well are the
> 
>> sorts of keyboard instruments he would actually have come across.
> 
>> 
> 
>> Martyn
> 
>> --- On Tue, 12/7/11, David van Ooijen <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
>   wrote:
> 
>> 
> 
>> From: David van Ooijen <davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
> 
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
> 
>> To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 
>> Date: Tuesday, 12 July, 2011, 15:13
> 
>> 
> 
>> On 12 July 2011 04:15, <[1]t...@heartistrymusic.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I think that, if the old masters had possessed effects, they would
> 
>> 
> 
>> have used them.
> 
>> .. and would have written different music which would have utilised
> 
>> these effects. Which is the whole point about HIP: using the means
>   the
> 
>> old had at their disposal to create a sound that could have been in
> 
>> their ears when they wre writing their music.
> 
>> David
> 
>> --
> 
>> *******************************
> 
>> David van Ooijen
> 
>> [2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
> 
>> www.davidvanooijen.nl
> 
>> *******************************
> 
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
> 
>> [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>> 
> 
>> --
> 
>> 
> 
>> References
> 
>> 
> 
>> 1.
>   http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=t...@heartistrymusic.com
> 
>> 2.
>   http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=davidvanooi...@gmail.com
> 
>> 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>   --
> 
>   Thomas Schall
> 
>   Doerflistrasse 2
> 
>   CH-6078 Lungern
> 
>   +41 41 678 00 79
> 
>   lauten...@lautenist.de
> 
>   -------------------------------------------------------------
>   --
> 
>   Thomas Schall
> 
>   Doerflistrasse 2
> 
>   CH-6078 Lungern
> 
>   +41 41 678 00 79
> 
>   lauten...@lautenist.de
>   --
> 


Reply via email to