I was just thinking that if beef can sound leaner and brighter (or clearer), 
while sheep might sound warmer and fuller, it sounds as though beef gut is 
situated somewhere in between sheep gut and some synthetics, where synthetics 
might be felst as colder and more transistor-like, while sheep gut 
warmer/sweeter and more valve-like (with beef gut more Mosfet like? Oups 
perhaps pushing the metaphore)

If Dan Larson is right and beef has less hair structure (see DL below) then 
perhaps its structure is indeed less far from synthetics than the "hairier" 
structure of sheep gut. This is not necesarily a criticism of the string, it 
could have the benefits of both types.
Regards
Anthony



Dear William and All,
     I just thought it might be worth resuming for William, the situation in 
relation to strong gut trebles, as appeared in discussions, here, and 
elsewhere, over the last few years,  even though this goes a little beyond the 
practical concerns of which William has spoken, by raising the question 
(William did not ask) as to whether it is possible to achieve a string that 
frays less, and what the effect might be on the resulting sound.
%
I notice that there may be (at least) two ways of achieving this. The first 
would be a chemical treatment of the gut, as appears to have been done by Mimmo 
Peruffo, according to his text at lute News 79 Oct 2006 (P14-15); the second 
would be a careful use of Beef Serosa (according to Dan Larson, at Gamut). 
In both cases, the result would be a stronger string, than using non treated 
sheep gut :
1) Mimmo "These (chemically treated) strings feel rather stiff to the 
fingertip. Thanks to their rough structure they are less liable to squashing, 
and less liable to jam on the nut, or be cut. Thanks to their high breaking 
index trebles are less heavily stressed, which becomes evident, especially 
through the fact that they stretch less while tuning (...). In practical terms, 
less peg turning is needed to reach the required pitch. Less stretching under 
stress means a higher resistance to fraying, which is the main problem of 
modern strings and is related to the action of the player's fingers, and 
perspiration, and string tension." Lute News 79
(in this exposé, Mimmo does not say whether he was using sheep or beef gut, 
although his historic hypothesis must surely be that it would have been applied 
to sheep gut; although it should evidently be possible to apply it to beef, 
resulting in an even stronger string?)
%
2) Dan: " Because beef gut strings are stronger than sheep gut strings they are 
a good choice for instruments with a long string length, or higher tension 
situations.   
In addition to the extra strength, the fiber structure of beef serosa has less 
of the fine hairs that sometimes develop on sheep gut strings."
http://gamutmusic.squarespace.com/beef-gut/
%
It would seem that both methods lead to a stiffer treble (which therefore frays 
less) and which presumably in each case also result in a brighter clearer 
sound: 
Dan: "The customer feedback we have received indicate that beef gut stabilizes 
more quickly and holds pitch a little better than sheep gut.  The tone has been 
described as being clearer and brighter than sheep but of equal gauge."
http://gamutmusic.squarespace.com/news/new-beef-gut-strings.html
Ed says of Dan's beef trebles, "Yes.  I love the trebles.  They last much 
longer, and have a clear, lean, wonderful sound."
http://www.mail-archive.com/lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg26619.html
This is more or less my experience of Mimmo's chemically strengthened string 
(although possibly not so lean?), which I think he is also trying to achieve 
with his new NG trebles, which are quite bright, but as Dan W. says comparing 
this string with gut, "slight loss of slightly richer gut sound more than 
compensated by a more open, distinct & extroverted quality to the overtones 
(...)"
http://www.mail-archive.com/lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg38490.html

%

Gamut does not of course make the only "strong" beef gut trebles. There are 
also testimonies about strong beef trebles by Toro (Italy) sold by Universale, 
as those also of Dan W.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg26619.html
Universale by Toro: They are not dedicated to lute- they simply make BY FAR the 
strongest, most durable treble strings I have ever used - in my case, a pair of 
.42 mm (perfectly true and in tune with each other) that I put on my vihuela 
(...) Got them in June, and only this past week is one of them beginning to 
shred." Dan Winheld
However, Dan goes on to say, "and for sound, those durable trebles are not 
quite as sweet as the more delicate strings. No free lunch!"
I imagine that could be true of most strong trebles, depending on the lute and 
your playing style, you might like its "clear, lean, wonderful sound" (as Ed), 
or feel it is a little less sweet (as Dan does), or less full, as Jonathan 
Dunford does, albeit comparing beef ropes and sheep designed by Corquoz and 
made by Toro:
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/ViolaDaGamba/message/970
"I've been using them ever since they existed (I had the first protytpes) and I 
find them stable and much "fuller" sounding than the
cow gut (for instance Pirastro/Savarez or Kurschner)."JD  (although this could 
both be rope structure as well as the origin sheep/beef)l 
%
Indeed, David v.O. says he prefers the sound of Kathedrale (sheep gut) to 
Universale (beef by Toro), presumably for the sweeter sound, even though he 
prefers the Toro to synthetics:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lute@cs.dartmouth.edu/msg26575.html
"I prefer the sound of Kathedrale, also _very_ long lasting, but some do 
disagree about here. Universale is _much_ better than nylon, it sounds like 
gut, feels like gut, tatstes like ... it is gut!" DvO
%
This is just the result of a rapid search as a reminder of what has been said 
over the last few years; and it may be something of a caricature. I note that 
no one has suggested that Keurschner top strings are particularly long lasting, 
although I believe these are also beef (and I know at least one gut enthusiast 
who likes them well for their sound). It may not be quite as simple as beef = 
long duration but slightly lean sound, sheep=shorter duration but warmer sound; 
of course the string maker's art goes beyond that.
Also, do Toro and Gamut strings sound alike (I haven't tried either)? Are all 
Toro's treble strings made for each specialist seller (Baroco, La Folia, 
Universale, Toro) identical, or different? Jonathan Dunford seems to say that 
Corquoz does design the one for Baroco. Of course this brief message is not an 
attempt at being complete.

Regards
Anthony




________________________________
De : William Samson <willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>
À : David Smith <d...@dolcesfogato.com> 
Cc : "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> 
Envoyé le : Jeudi 19 janvier 2012 9h28
Objet : [LUTE] Re: String hairs

   Unless you want to be continually replacing your first string, you
   should either drop to a lower pitch standard (even a semitone will
   increase the lifespan quite significantly) or if that isn't an option
   (horror of horrors) use a synthetic (e.g. nylgut) string for your
   first.  There's always the forlorn hope that somebody will start
   producing stronger gut, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

   Maybe one of us knows more than me about the process of giving gut an
   even diameter, but I have heard there are two options, one involving
   the abrasion of the 'rough' string, and the other using strings that
   have been very carefully hand-made with selected strips and don't need
   grinding of the string's surface to make it even.  The latter type
   would be stronger, but I wouldn't know where to buy them.

   Bill
   From: David Smith <d...@dolcesfogato.com>
   To: Lute List <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Thursday, 19 January 2012, 6:25
   Subject: [LUTE] String hairs
     I have a new lute that has gut strings on it. I have had it for about
   3
     days. The 1^st string has unraveled a single "hair" about the 7^th
     fret. In the past I have just cut these as short as possible but
     frequently the string breaks within a couple of weeks. Is there any
     better way to treat these "hairs"?
     I play with no nails and have been very careful so am somewhat
     surprised at this happening so quickly. Is this common with gut
     strings?
     Thanks for any words of wisdom.
     Regards
     David
     --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Reply via email to