On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:52:15 +0100, David van Ooijen wrote
> > the Paris copy.18 The Modena copy is in excellent condition and
> > contains corrections and alterations that appear to be in Castaldi's
> > own hand; neither of the other two copies has these markings.
> >
> > Now, given this information, which original would _you_ choose?
> And > guess which one Minkoff used :-/ >
>
> It doesn't say, do you know?
Donata's article I linked to does mention it (footnote 15. page 389/page
19 of the article) - Paris. Too bad, but kind of typical for their
"editorial" process. And their repoduction technique ("photocopy" on
steroids) often makes things worse then in the original.
> Does anybody know what original SPES
> uses?
Strangely, my copy of the SPES seems to have disapeared ... But I _think_
they used London. But don't sue me on that.
Cheers, RalfD
> David
> --
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
