Tobiah wrote:
It's a common misconception that 88.2 is somehow easier to re-sample down
to 44.1. I suppose people think that the software can just throw away
every other sample, but the algorithm even in this case is far more
complex.
It really is simpler.
Filter out all frequencies above 22050Hz and then throw
away half the samples.
There's no need for something called 'interpolation', which
adds extra complexity when re-sampling from 96k to 44.1k
If you are resampling, it makes a difference which software you use.
Audition (aka Cool Edit) has always been known to perform well.
andy
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
