I forgot to mention that I discovered the Franc,ois Campion' quote
   thanks to the "Theorbo" page on Facebook :-)
   ...and I just checked my own copy (thank you, Andreas!) of Franc,ois
   Campion, "Addition au Traite d'accompagnement et de composition par la
   regle de l'octave", Paris 1730: the quote can be found at p. 26 and, of
   course, was published in 1730, not in 1716 (date of first "Traite
   d'accompagnement et de composition selon la regle des octaves de
   musique").
   Luca
   -------- Messaggio originale --------

    Oggetto: Re: [LUTE] Theorbo set up
       Data: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:58:30 +0100
   Mittente: Luca Manassero [1]<l...@manassero.net>
          A: [2]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu

   Hi,
   I am afraid it's a really looooong story.
   - Italian theorbos were, as far as I know, always 6 (fretted) + 8
   basses.
   - 7 + 7 are kind of hard to find n Museums and collections, but
   existed. Extremely helpful when you need an occasional G sharp :-)
   - 8 (fretted) + 6 basses are apparently very common nowadays. Not even
   one original in museums and collections, as far as I know, BUT
   Franc,ois Campion (1716) in his treatise states that most of his
   colleagues have a theorbo configured that way and they call it "theorbe
   `a la Maltot" from the name of his predecessor at the Royal Academy of
   Music. We have strictly no other infos about a musician and theorbist
   called Maltot, unfortunately.
   Of course this last configuration is very confortable for many good
   reasons, as you can finger an F sharp AND a G sharp, plus - of course -
   many other chord patterns.
   Best,
   Luca
   Anthony Hart on 20/02/14 13:59 wrote:

   Theorbos can be set up up as 6+8, 7+7 and 8+6. Does anyone have any
   preference and reasons?

   Thanks

   Anthony

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
[3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

References

   1. mailto:l...@manassero.net
   2. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to