I'm working on it!
   Martyn
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: "Braig, Eugene" <brai...@osu.edu>
   To: lute list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2014, 17:21
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Vivaldi solo lute
   .And I also tend to agree with you in this case, Martyn (as we hashed
   out here in the past).  However, Eric's article is published, is thus
   something I can cite, and seems relevant to Konstantin's original
   inquiry.  It would be nice to see more published on this specific
   field.
   Best,
   Eugene
   From: Martyn Hodgson [mailto:[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 11:30 AM
   To: Braig, Eugene; lute list
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Vivaldi solo lute
   Dear Eugene,
   Without wanting to re-open a debate of over 10 years ago, despite Count
   Wrtby's origins I'm a bit sceptical that the German/Bohemian mandora in
   D (the E mandora didn't really surface until later in the century) made
   any significant inroads into Italy in the early 18th century. Further,
   the writing of Vivaldi's 'leuto' parts is, in my view, more suited to a
   rather higher pitched instrument in nominal G (or even A) which is, of
   course, simply the old lute tuning which seems to have persisted in
   Italy through much of the 18th century and is reflected in various
   sources including the Dalla Casa MS and extant instruments made at the
   time as well as in paintings of the period.
   There are also, of course, other works (including the Anon concertos
   from Bob Spencer's collection) which are very similar to the Vivaldi
   and are clearly labelled for archlute.
   But I agree that a small 'mandolin' like instrument playing at pitch is
   unlikely (however tuned).
   regards
   Martyn
   ________________________________________
   From: "Braig, Eugene" <[2]brai...@osu.edu>
   To: lute list <[3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Wednesday, 4 June 2014, 15:50
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Vivaldi solo lute
   Greetings Konstantin,
   This topic has received some discussion here in the past, at least
   peripherally.  Searching the archives might reveal some discussion of
   interest.
   I don't think the treble mandore/mandora/mandwr/what-have-you was in
   very widespread use by Vivaldi's time, certainly not in Italian
   places.  In large part, the lute works were dedicated to a Bohemian
   nobleman named Wrtby.  This led Eric Liefeld to speculate that the
   works to designate "leuto" were intended for a baritone voiced mandora
   from D (Liefeld, E. 2002/2003. Pondering Vivaldi's Leuto. Lute Society
   of America Quarterly 28(1):4-8.).
   On O'Dette's recording of the Vivaldi works with the Parley of
   Instruments (1986, Hyperion CDA66160), he speculated the works to
   designate "mandolino" to be intended for the five or six course
   mandolino (i.e., [g]-b-e'-a'-d''-g'') played with a plectrum and the
   Bohemian "leuto" works to be for the same instrument played with the
   fingers.  Personally, given the spread of violins and cello-driven
   basso continuo, I think adding mandolino as soloist to the "leuto"
   works sounds to crowd too many voices in the treble range.  I prefer to
   hear the "leuto" works with the lutenist an octave lower than notated,
   a common short hand carried on in guitar music to this day.
   I think the general consensus among those who really care about baroque
   mandolin is that it was probably ordinarily played with the fingers
   until into the classical era.  That is how I play the instrument.
   Unfortunately, most performers who come to baroque incarnations of
   mandolin seem to approach it after having studied the modern mandolin.
   Almost universally, they play it with a plectrum (usually a quill, and
   there are some who argue a quill was never applied to any gut-strung
   mandolin types: that a sliver of cherry would be more appropriate).  In
   spite of the likelihood of period performance practice, recordings of
   baroque mandolins played with the fingers are relatively rare.
   Best,
   Eugene
   -----Original Message-----
   From: [4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Konstantin
   Shchenikov
   Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 2:51 AM
   To: lute list
   Subject: [LUTE] Vivaldi solo lute
     Dear friends!
     I am curious abour mandore (treble lute) as solo instrument for
   Vivaldi
     concertos and trio sonatas with liuto obligato. Have anyone an
     experience with it?
     Could you point me to some research?
     I am especially interesting about how far it from (or how close to)
     baroque mandolin? Makes it sence to use baroque mandolin instead of
     mandore? I've read somewhere that renaissance mandore technique was
     quite similar to renaissance lute and fingers were in used, not
     plectrum. What's your suggestions about 18 century? Could I use
   fingers
     or have to play with plectrum?
     And the last, do you know who can built such a thing?
     And any other information is very appreciated!
     Greetings from St.Petersburg,
     Konstantin
     --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:brai...@osu.edu
   3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to