Christian et al.
It is possible to set up your email program to filter out emails from
individuals. That's what I do with repeated spammers, boors or
insulters on this list. I know, a filtered life is less diversified,
but it's also nice and quiet.
David out
*******************************
David van Ooijen
[1]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
[2]www.davidvanooijen.nl
*******************************
On 6 August 2016 at 10:17, Martyn Hodgson
<[3]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Christian,
Point taken - though others also expressed concern that personal
emails
became public! Bit I'll aim to send any further communications on
this
direct matter only to Monica.
regards,
Martyn
____________________________________________________________
______
From: Christian Aretz <[4]christian.ar...@posteo.de>
To: Martyn Hodgson <[5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: "[6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk" <[7]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>;
LutList
<[8]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Saturday, 6 August 2016, 9:10
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Protocol was Re: Privacy
Please excuse my lack of interest in netiquette-discussions, but
wouldn't it be a good moment to stop this publicly conducted (and
meanwhile extremely annoying!) discussion now (!) and get back to
normal life and lute related topics?
Thanks,
Christian
> Am 06.08.2016 um 09:53 schrieb Martyn Hodgson
<[1][9]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>:
>
> Dear Monica,
> Well, kettle and pot comes to mind! But seriously, I'm
certainly
happy
> to admit that I was wrong in this case by expecting a
personal email
to
> remain private. This is the whole point of my last message
which,
I'm
> very sorry to say, you have avoided addressing. Whether I
know Anton
> Hoger (I don't) and his work (only what's on ISMLP) is wholly
> immaterial to this matter.
> And finally, how is it wrong to suggest to someone that there
may be
> other ways to achieve what they may be wishing to do? And how
is it
> wrong to do this privately and so avoiding (or trying to) any
personal
> embarrassment and ridiculous slanging matches?
> regards,
> Martyn
> ______________________________
____________________________________
>
> From: "[2][10]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk"
<[3][11]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
> To: LutList <[4][12]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Cc: Martyn Hodgson <[5][13]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Sent: Friday, 5 August 2016, 17:41
> Subject: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
> Clearly this is going to run and run as Martyn can never
admit that
he
> might be in the wrong.
> As far as I am aware Martyn does not know Anton personally,
knows
> nothing about him or his work, doesn't understand why he is
doing it
or
> why he sends messages to the list to draw attention to it.
> I think it was officious and patronising of Martyn to contact
Anton
off
> the list and say to him - if this is what he did say
> "Have you ever considered learning to play from figured bass?
This
> would save
> you much mundane work making these unnecessary
> transcriptions/arrangements".
> Anton is a professional player and doesn't need any advice
from
Martyn.
> Other people certainly don't think that Anton's
transcriptions are
> unnecessry.
> If what you want to say is not suitable to be said in public
perhaps
> you should ask yourself what right you have to contact
someone whom
you
> have never met and say it to them in private.
> That seems like harassment to me.
> As ever
> Monica
> ----Original Message----
> From: [1][6][14]ari...@hotmail.co.uk
> Date: 05/08/2016 12:38
> To: "[2][7][15]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"<
[3][8][16]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>,
> "[4][9][17]mjlh...@tiscali.co.
> uk"<[5][10][18]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
> Subj: Fw: Protocol was Re: [LUTE] Privacy
> Dear Monica,
> Well, to be clear, I didn't wish to say anything on the open
list
> since, knowing how some may take any suggestion, even if
meant
> helpfully (as explained in my longer subsequent posting), as
a
slight,
> a private rather than public message was thought more
appropriate in
> this case. Just because someone's name is on this list
doesn't
prohibit
> one from conducting private communications if considered more
> appropriate (and tactful..........).
> In general I think the usual protocol is probably the wisest
to
follow:
> a personal message is just that. Ralf Mattes well sets this
out in
his
> message yesterday.
> And yes, if we think it more appropriate to discuss things
personally
> with another individual list member (who we may already know
anyway)
> then I can see no problem with that. Indeed, some of the more
useful
> and helpful messages I receive from time to time are by from
individual
> list members not copied to the entire list. Horses for
courses I
> think..........
> regards,
> Martyn.
> ________________________________
> From: "[6][11][19]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk"
<[7][12][20]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
> To: LutList <[8][13][21]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2016, 15:31
> Subject: [LUTE] Privacy
> I think that what I was trying to say has been misconstrued -
as is
> often the case with these arguments.
> If you are on Facebook - or Earlyguitar.ning people can only
contact
> you directly if you accept them as friends.
> This list is different. Anyone can join, there is no
moderator,
nobody
> decides who may join. That means that everyone on the list
has
access
> to everyone else's e-mails. This facility should not be
abused.
> As I understand it Martyn contacted Anton after he had posted
details
> of his latest intabulations on this list. If Martyn has
anything
> helpful to say that might help Anton to make his work even
more
useful
> than it is already - and a lot of people do find it very
useful and
are
> grateful to him for posting the details - then why not say it
here.
We
> have discussed this before.
> Does being on this list mean that anyone is entitled to
engage in a
> one-
> to-one correspondence with you?
> Better leave it at that as this will probably be misconstrued
too.
> Monica
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> [9][14][22]http://www.cs.[23]dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/
index.html
>
> --
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[15][24]ari...@hotmail.co.uk
> 2. mailto:[16]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 3. mailto:[17]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 4. mailto:[18][25]mjlh...@tiscali.co.
> 5. mailto:[19][26]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
> 6. mailto:[20][27]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
> 7. mailto:[21][28]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
> 8. mailto:[22]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
> 9. [23][29]http://www.cs.dartmouth.
edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
--
References
1. mailto:[30]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
2. mailto:[31]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
3. mailto:[32]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
4. mailto:[33]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
5. mailto:[34]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
6. mailto:[35]ari...@hotmail.co.uk
7. mailto:[36]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
8. mailto:[37]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
9. mailto:[38]mjlh...@tiscali.co.
10. mailto:[39]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
11. mailto:[40]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
12. mailto:[41]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
13. mailto:[42]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
14. [43]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
15. mailto:[44]ari...@hotmail.co.uk
16. mailto:[45]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
17. mailto:[46]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
18. mailto:[47]mjlh...@tiscali.co.
19. mailto:[48]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
20. mailto:[49]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
21. mailto:[50]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
22. mailto:[51]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
23. [52]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
2. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
3. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
4. mailto:christian.ar...@posteo.de
5. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
6. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
7. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
8. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
9. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
10. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
11. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
12. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
13. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
14. mailto:ari...@hotmail.co.uk
15. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
16. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
17. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
18. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
19. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
20. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
21. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
22. http://www.cs/
23. http://dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/
24. mailto:ari...@hotmail.co
25. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
26. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
27. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
28. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
29. http://www.cs.dartmouth/
30. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
31. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
32. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
33. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
34. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co
35. mailto:ari...@hotmail.co.uk
36. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
37. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
38. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
39. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
40. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
41. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
42. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
43. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~
44. mailto:ari...@hotmail.co.uk
45. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
46. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
47. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co
48. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
49. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
50. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
51. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
52. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~
