Russell Coker <[email protected]> wrote: > 4) Run ZFS for mail storage in the DomU and use something other than ZFS for > the Dom0. This has the same performance problems as 3) but without the issue > of different ZFS instances fighting about it. Also I would lose the support > for hashes on the zvol data, I could use files on BTRFS for similar data > integrity (I'm using RAID-1 so RAID-Z isn't an option and therefore the > benefits of ZFS over BTRFS are fewer) but that would still give performance > issues.
XFS doesn't have the fsck problem, but it isn't optimized for large numbers of small files, as I recall. I can't comment on reliability/performance. I don't know much about JFS either - XFS seems to be receiving more development attention from Red Hat and elsewhere at the moment. I don't think Reiser 3 is seeing much work anymore either. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
