Tony Langdon <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> DHCPv6 would be one option, static addressing another.

Exactly.
> 
> >DHCPv6 prefix delegation to supply the /56 block, I use wide-dhcpv6-client; I
> >then let neighbour discovery (via radvd) propagate addresses to the local 
> >LAN,
> >which in practice means my laptop, as the other devices on the LAN are all
> >IPv4-only equipment such as a SIP phone and a printer.
> 
> My router looks after all of that.  The router is advertising a /64 
> prefix to the LAN.  I have several IPv6 capable devices - a number of 
> PCs, one Mac, and a handful of iPhones and iPads (yes, the iOS 
> devices support IPv6).

My Linux machine is also serving as the router and the modem (with a Traverse
Technologies ADSL card).
> 
> >We'll see more of those. I also know people who would like to become informed
> >of any IPv6-capable SIP phones on the market.
> 
> That would be handy, though the SIP gateways I use don't support IPv6 (yet).

FreeSWITCH and Asterisk both support it. I don't know of any SIP to PSTN
gateway available through an ISP that does, but on the other hand, IPv6
certainly simplifies making calls to other peoples' SIP clients or
FreeSWITCH/Asterisk systems (provided they have it on their networks, of
course). In essence, NAT goes away.

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to