On 27 May 2014 17:29, Anders Holmström <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That's an unnecessary nitpick. You can assume they are the same thing > for all intensive purposes. > > Another unnecessary nitpick: *intensive* purposes? Another unnecessary nitpick: Are you sure that was a mistake? :-) -- Brian May <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
