Russell Coker <[email protected]> writes: > Is there any way to publish the fact that I would prefer to receive mail via > SSL?
Not that I know of. I think you would have to configure the sending server to require it for the destination server. Which really isn't what you wanted. > My understanding is that if a hostile party proxies the SMTP session such > that > the sender thinks that my MTA is incapable of SSL then the sender will > happily > send it unencrypted. Yes, I believe you could be correct here. The sending server has no secure way of knowing that the remote server supports SSL. Ideally this could be published in DNS, I am not aware of any standards to do this however. I haven't looked either. -- Brian May <[email protected]> https://linuxpenguins.xyz/brian/ _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
