On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:56:28AM -0500, Rudd, Michael wrote: > My 2 cents in dealing with DNS and your idea of the OPS feature. I have > implemented the OPS feature into the 2.6 kernel and its running well. > Without that feature, we wound up having all the DNS queries from our > DNS client get sent to the same realserver.
Thanks for the feedback, its very useful. > The problem we did run into, which I've gotten help from the community > on, is when using LVS-NAT, the source packet isn't SNAT'd. This is > because LVS on the outgoing packet doesn't know the packet is an LVS > packet, so it just forwards it out. I fixed this with an iptables rule > to SNAT it myself. Mmm, I guess OPS isn't quite the right solution to the DNS problem :( -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
