Hi Joe,
Hey thanks for the response.
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
you're showing a single realserver with the director running in local
node.
I am? I guess I don't understand what this means. What I thought I had
is a MASTER and a BACKUP director for failover (didn't post the BACKUP
config but it's there on another machine), and two realservers, .25 and
.26, and a VIP, .215. Just one LAN instance, as all servers are on local
LAN, no WAN instance since I have just a single WAN gateway/router to
Internet. I get the failover (and back) ok but ixnay on the load balance.
It is a two realserver configuration, but it's not the basic
configuration.
Is this a valid setup (maybe not your classic 'basic' config but a
rather simple config nonetheless)?
I'm using 'rr' scheduling. I've looked through the forum and google
and I see other entries with similar situation of no load balancing
occurring. Can this be fixed? I was expecting that the connections
would alternate between the two realservers when using the 'rr'
scheduler.
I would have thought so too.
Do you see anything in my config that could be the cause of the lack of
load balancing? Or is this really a bug?
Here is ipvsadm:
# ipvsadm
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 192.168.1.215:ssh rr
-> 192.168.1.26:ssh Masq 1 0 1
-> 192.168.1.25:ssh Local 1 3 0
#
Joe
thx,
Gerry
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
