On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, David Hinkle wrote: > Oh, just a quick suggestion. This hack would be > completely unnecessary if you could simply configure a > backup LVS server not to try and load balance.
do you know that in the current way of doing director failover that the backup director is getting the ipvsadm state table from the active director, so that it when the backup becomes the active, that it knows the state of the lvs controlled connections? If you know that already, what's missing from LVS that you need? > I just want a backup to sit there and collect data, I > don't want it to try and load balance anything until I > promote it! :) It doesn't loadbalance till you send it packets. It seems that you and I have a different idea about what's happening here and I don't know what you idea is. Can you straighten me out? Thanks Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
