Matthew Crocker schrieb: > Hello, > > I used to run LVS on a cluster years ago, in fact the cluster is > still running but I haven't been keeping track of the progress for > LVS. I'm putting together a new cluster and would like to have it > setup with active/active directors instead of active/passive. > > Does anyone have a working configuration using LVS-NAT & active/active > directors? Assuming I have 2 directors and 4 real servers. Traffic > is load balanced via per-flow CEF to each director and each director > then load balances the traffic to one of the 4 servers. How do I > configure the real servers to send the returning traffic through the > correct director so it can follow the NAT tables? Or, with the LVS > directors syncing their connection maps does it even matter? > > > > -Matt >
Hi, I would not choose such a setup. If you only have two directors I would do active/passive with these and sync their connection tables. Why would you do load balancing between two machines? In case of a failure one machine has to take the load anyway. Michael. _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
