Thanks for the reply Graeme, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 12:20 +0530, hirantha wrote: >> Basically I don't administrate the firewalls, routers on the realserver >> resides ISP. I think this is obvious -- >> most of people doesn't have network control on the ISP. But I can tell them >> the situation. I would like to know what >> would be on firewalls and routers to be eligible to establish lvs-tun. What >> should I tell them..? > > The people administering the networks that the realservers live on need > to allow egress (outbound) traffic from the VIP for LVS-TUN to work. > > Using TUN, the realservers reply directly to the clients: > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/VS-IPTunneling.html >
Is there are users exists who using LVS-TUN, VPN or Layer2 network spanned..? (who do not control ISP level). Is there away we could accomplish this -- Global server load balancing. I know some commercial version of this but, I prefer something like LVS-tun. I would appreciate if you could share your scenario with me. Thanks and regards -+> Hirantha > If you have realservers on networks controlled by different providers, > they probably won't advertise the VIP to their peers or permit traffic > from the VIP to leave their network, especially if their upstreams apply > filters to the announcements they receive. It would be seen as a form of > spoofing. > > You can ask them to, but I suspect the answer will be no. > > Graeme > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
