Would another valid approach be to set up your real servers in a heartbeat config with the 'real IP' failing between them? I know it adds another level of configuration/complexity, but I think it would accomplish what you're looking for.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Pedoussaut Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:16 AM To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Real and Fallback in Piranha Sean Drill wrote: > I am however only able to get piranha/lvs to do load sharing. In this > case as long as both servers are set to UP, then traffic will be > balanced between all servers (determined by load balancing scheme and > weighting.) What I am attempting to do is create a virtual server in > LVS, which has two active REAL servers, however direct traffic only to > one of them, unless otherwise directed or if the active member fail, > then direct traffic to the backup. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
