Hello, On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:05:29 +0100 Sebastian Vieira wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Christian Balzer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Noting the lack of replies or a native rad-acct check option for > > ldirectord I was wondering why not adding a UDP "connect" service > > check to it? I know it's not as straightforward or reliable as TCP, > > but in most environments it should give much more useful results than > > "none" or "ping". Netcat seems to have no problem figuring out if > > something is listening on an UDP port: > > > I know this is not exactly what you're asking for, but why not try the > new external check feature? > New... feature.... ARGH, I was looking at an old (Debian etch) manpage. The new boxes running lenny indeed have a ldirectord with that feature listed. Now that should make it really easy and without the need to fondle stuff that is not under my control.
Thanks a lot for bringing this up! Regards, Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer NOC [email protected] Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Network Services http://www.gol.com/ https://secure3.gol.com/mod-pl/ols/index.cgi/?intr_id=F-2ECXvzcr6656 _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
