> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:lvs-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gustavo Mateus > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:23 AM > To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list. > Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS vs commercial LB in critical environment > > Siim, > > I use LVS for more than 3 years now, distributing requests to 60 web > servers for airline companies B2C and B2B systems. > One of my directors is up for 795 days, load avareged 0%, handling 300 > connections per real server and 40 Mbps os traffic constantly. > > You cannot go wrong using lvs and keepalived for failover protection. > It is definitely one of the best piece of software I ever used. >
Just as a note, we're load balancing a heck of a lot more connections per real server, and a bunch more bandwidth than this without any problem. Jason Faulkner Linux Engineer, Rackspace Email & Apps [email protected] o: (540) 443-2101 (ex. 505-2101) _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
