Do you think the size of UDP buffer is enough? Patch for lower pause was in previous message but how to use a dynamic pause?
Regards, Aleksey -----Original Message----- On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:07:12AM +0200, Aleksey Chudov wrote: > Hello! > > I have the following parameters set on LVS Master: > net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 > net.core.wmem_default = 118784 > net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 > net.core.rmem_default = 118784 > > # netstat -s > Udp: > 12669936 packets received > 398141 packets to unknown port received. > 0 packet receive errors > 47229187 packets sent > RcvbufErrors: 0 > SndbufErrors: 29490577 > > > How to know correct buffer parameters for 16k conn/ps? > Is it possible to fix connection sync daemon messages without recompiling > the krenel? I wonder if the kernel should be fixed to a) use a lower pause between batches of sends (its currently HZ = 1s) or b) use a dynamic pause depending on many packets are being handled. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
