Hi, Why do you want to use the LVS-DR if the traffic thats get out pass through it again? Why not use LVS-NAT ?
Best, Miki On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Dennis J. <denni...@conversis.de> wrote: > I'm not dealing with the arp problem but the martian problem that only > occurs when the director is also the default gateway/router. > I'm wondering though why Red Hat recommends using aprtables_jf when adding > a few lines to sysctl.conf seems to be so much simpler and less invasive. > > Regards, > Dennis > > On 01/20/2010 04:57 PM, Michael Ben-Nes wrote: > > Hi Keijser, > > > > Is there problem with the way RedHat suggest? > > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html/Virtual_Server_Administration/s1-lvs-direct-VSA.html#s2-lvs-direct-arptables-VSA > > > > Miki > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:03 PM, L.S. Keijser<l...@linux.nl> wrote: > > > >> Hi Dennis, > >> > >> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:08 +0100, Dennis J. wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> I'm trying to set up a couple of realservers behind a > >>> gateway/router/firewall and would like to put the LVS-DR config on that > >>> machine too. In another setup I'm already running LVS-DR but there the > >>> director is not sitting between the client and the realservers. > >>> I've read the documentation and googled around and found that the > >>> director/gateway combination only works with patches applied and some > >>> additional non-standard configuration steps. > >>> What I'm wondering is if there is an easier way to accomplish this now? > >> The > >>> references I found on the web go all the way back to 2001 and talk > about > >>> 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so I'm not sure if the patches/hacks to make this > >> work > >>> are still valid or if there is an easier way to accomplish this > nowadays? > >> > >> I assume by all this you mean solving the ARP problem. If so, take a > >> look at this section of the HOWTO which is specific on 2.6 kernels: > >> > >> > >> > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.arp_problem.html#2.6_arp > >> > >> In a nutshell: you don't need to patch anything, just set some proc > >> values and bring up a loopback device (in that order). > >> > >> -- > >> Léon > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > >> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > >> > >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > >> Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users