For now I am just trying to get a simple html page to load. I am listening on all IP's and I did restart apache after adding the Virtual IP to my apache real server just to make sure it was listening on that IP now as well.
I am using a virtual server setup (many sites on one IP) in apache, if it matters. Anyone have any thoughts about my direct routing concerns and the setup for that? On 3/30/2010 5:11 PM, Anoop Bhat wrote: > I also had this issue at one point in time. > > Are you trying to do SSL virtual servers? > > I thought I fixed my issue by ensuring that the real apache servers were > listening on all IP addresses on port 80/443. > > Anoop Bhat > Systems Administrator > Trustwave > 70 W. Madison > Chicago, IL, 60602 > O: 312.873.7446 > C: 312.925.3271 > > > > ________________________________ > From: James Chase<ja...@mandala-designs.com> > Reply-To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing > list."<lvs-users@linuxvirtualserver.org> > Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:03:57 -0500 > To:<lvs-users@linuxvirtualserver.org> > Subject: [lvs-users] CentOS 5 apache real servers don't respond > > I am trying to setup LVS on CentOS 5.4 using piranha/pulse. Ideally (I > think) I would like to do direct routing so that I can still have my > real servers (apache machines) able to connect directly to the internet. > > However, I'm not able to get the apache servers to respond correctly to > the Virtual IP requests. From tcpdump it seems like the requests are > being forwarded to the real server from the LVS but I don't get the page > returned to me in my browser, and I don't see the request being sent out > in tcpdump on the apache real server. I believe I have the virtual IP > setup correctly on the real server. > > As a caveat though, if the real server responds and the apache server > response goes out on it's external IP (which would be different than the > Virual IP) -- isn't my firewall going to block that connection since it > is not the IP of the connection I originally tried to establish? > > I also tried NAT briefly but was not able to get a connection there > either. Is NAT the suggested way of doing this? It seems like indirect > routing would be inconvenient/difficult if you had many virtual servers > on the real apache servers and multiple SSL sites running as well. > > Thanks, > James > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users