On 2 July 2010 10:07, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:48:20AM +0200, Anders Franzen wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 16:05 +0200, Kristoffer Egefelt wrote: > > > Hi list > > > I've been working around this issue for years using split DNS, DNAT > > > rules which bypasses LVS etc. - now I really need this to work the > > > "correct" way, ie. realservers can connect to VIP's the exact same way > > > internet clients can. > > > I wonder if using Full NAT support, which I am trying to get merged, is an > answer to this. > > http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2010-05/msg00000.html >
I tend to use HAProxy in any situation where LVS/FullNAT (Which I call SNAT would be used). But it would be great to get support added if it doesn't break anything :-). Let me know if you need any help testing. Thanks. -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
