On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:11 +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > I think that you have hit a known limitation which is that LVS can't > load-balance requests from a real-sever when LVS-NAT is in use. > Well, not without a work-around. > > There was a recent discussion of this on this list[1] > And there is also a discussion of the problem and work-arounds > in the HOWTO[2]. As stated in that thread, my personal feeling > is that this problem can be resolved with full-nat support which > I am currently trying to get merged[3] > > [1] http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2010-07/msg00000.html > [2] > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.lvs_clients_on_realservers.html#lvs_clients_on_LVS-NAT_realserver_contacting_services_on_VIP > [3] > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel/34529
Hi Simon, Thanks for the (quick) reply! I think the best solution in this situation would be full-nat, as the most other workarounds rely on the realservers being able to connect to eachother using the RIP, which is prohibited in our vlan policy :( Since we're kind of in a hurry, i'm going to move one VIP onto a second director to avoid this problem (for now). Found out today that was an option as well in our setup. Thanks! Léon _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
