On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 22:13 +0100, JL wrote: > ...I am familiar with the scenario you are describing - where each > machine decides the other should handle the connection - but it is not > the situation that is occurring at the moment. This problem didn't > happen with the exact same setup under 2.6.27.45, and...
Hrm. Then might I recommend an Occam's Roazor approach to this? Compile a number of kernels from the one which worked up to the one which doesn't. Reboot the backup; test; if it doesn't happen then you know the change cam later than the kernel you're running. > Thanks, but I don't think we have cracked it yet. (However, for > thoroughness, I will remove the fwmark rules on the backup, as you > suggested, and report back.) Not the fwmarks! For completeness I meant "clear out the IPVS rules on the backup but leave the modules loaded". Graeme
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
