Thanks a ton for the pointers, Simon! Seth
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:46:53PM -0500, Seth Call wrote: > > Simon, > > > > Thanks for the quick response. > > > > So, we are new to LVS and completely not kernel developers. Fine... > > > > So our thoughts are to first use sh as-is, because it'll work for > testing, > > development, and to some degree production. > > > > So once we know we are using LVS as the project goes further, we can > build > > 'sh2'. > > > > I was going to find the sh code and at least get an idea of how difficult > > it'd be to make a sh2. It sounds trivial to me, given that sh already > > exists--but it would be a new environment so that'd be the main issue. > > I agree with that analysis. > > For reference, the sh code is in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.c > in the kernel tree. Development usually occurs against > Patrick McHardy's nf-next-2.6 tree which is on git.kernel.org. > > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
