Op 19-10-2010 15:19, Graeme Fowler schreef: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:56 +0200, Dirk Bonenkamp - Bean IT wrote: >> I still don't know what exactly the problem was with LVS-NAT... > Very likely that iptables/netfilter conntrack module was also processing > the VIP traffic, adding to the latency. Obviously that's only true if > you're using a conntrack module, but this is often the default on NAT > directors. > This wasn't the issue AFAIK. The conntrack modules where not loaded. They do get loaded when adding extra NAT rules trough iptables, but when only using LVS-NAT, they don't get loaded. The tests where done without the modules loaded.
Dirk _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
