From: Ferenc Wagner <[email protected]> | > I'm running ldirectord with > http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/rev/6e8b562f5414 applied for better IPv6 > support. Basically, it works fine, thanks for implementing this. But I > wonder whether there's a fundamental reason for not allowing IPv4 and > IPv6 virtual services with the same fwmark, like > > virtual=1 > [...] > virtual6=1 > [...] > > which results in > > Error [21297] reading file /etc/ldirectord.cf at line 15: duplicate virtual > server > > if tried. Is this only an overzealous sanity check in ldirectord, or > are iptables and ip6tables fwmarks actually related somehow?
Thanks for the report. When I enhanced the IPv6 support of ldirectord, I forgotten to take care about this case. I also think that ldirectord should support this case. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
