Hello Julian, I rechecked all the figures after a while. Below is average statistics for the peak hour.
1. "port 0", "HZ/10" patches on Master, "port 0", "HZ/10" patches on Backup sync_threshold = 3 10 Results: sync traffic 75 Mbit/s, 6300 packets/sec, 58 %sys CPU on Backup, 44 %soft CPU on Master PersistConn: 93.53% ActiveConn: 98.12% InActConn: 99.47% 2. "port 0", "HZ/10" and "sync" patches on Master, "port 0", "HZ/10" patches on Backup sync_refresh_period = 1000 sync_retries = 0 sync_threshold = 0 0 Results: sync traffic 50 Mbit/s, 4200 packets/sec, 42 %sys CPU on Backup, 46 %soft CPU on Master PersistConn: 96.06% ActiveConn: 98.53% InActConn: 98.92% Forwarded traffic and connections rate was the same in both case. So, looks like new sync mechanism is more efficient. Regards, Aleksey _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
