On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 02:05:25PM -0500, krishna prasad wrote: > Any feed-back on this? > > Thanks > Prasad. > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, krishna prasad > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I was going thru the LVS documents and tutorial especially the high > > availability features supported.As per my understanding > > 1) When active director fails the clients with established connections > > don't experience any connection loss, i.e. no reconnection is required. > > (this is because that active director has synchronized the connection state > > with backup director) > > 2) When the real server fails, clients need to reconnect as director don't > > move the connections to backup real server. > > > > Assuming that my understanding is correct, how complex or big to have a > > feature to support moving connections of failed real server to other real > > server?
I believe that this can be achieved by running fault tolerant real-servers, that is two real-servers running in lock-step. Two solutions that I am aware of that allow that to be done are Kemari and Remus, both of which. I believe that both of those solutions work in conjunction with Xen and that a version of Kemari for KVM is also available. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
