Stefan Bauer wrote:
: -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
: Von:  Jan Kasprzak <k...@fi.muni.cz>
: >     I think my configuration above does exactly this
: > (well, I have omitted "lip" address, using SNAT to a different address
: > instead of MASQUERADE would solve it).
: > 
: > : I just dont want to mess in userland with iptables manually.
: > 
: >     OK, understood. For me it was still better than installing
: > a reverse proxy for a single virtual service out of tens I already
: > serve using IPVS.
: 
: Again, as far as i understood, no reverse proxy is required. It is handled by 
the ip_vs netfilter module if you use fullnat method.
: 
: Please correct my, if I'm wrong on this.

        Well, as you wrote, there it is not merged to mainline
(and definitely not available on my not-so-new IPVS server). So for me
it was either a user-space reverse proxy or IPVS+SNAT.

-Yenya

-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak  <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| New GPG 4096R/A45477D5 - see http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/pgp-rollover.txt |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/    Journal: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/ |
Please don't top post and in particular don't attach entire digests to your
mail or we'll all soon be using bittorrent to read the list.     --Alan Cox

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Reply via email to