Nick, The SNAT support should work fine for all recent v3 kernels... or 2.6.36 (only).
However I would expect that most people use HAProxy for SNAT mode as long as its not a huge number of concurrent connections 100K+. We use LVS for DR or NAT and HAProxy for SNAT mode on Loadbalancer.org appliances and have found it very fast and reliable. Pretty sure Barracuda does the same as us and Kemp use LVS + a proprietary software proxy they bought ages ago from an old German load balancer vendor. On 28 October 2013 19:29, Nick Calvert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Doing some research to determine how SNAT might work with LVS and I find > lots of old talk involving kernel patches. Is this something that is a bit > more mainstream these days? Is anyone doing it with success? I'm not being > lazy, but would anyone care to summarize the state-of-the-art for me? > Thought this might be the best place. > > Cheers, > > Nick > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/ _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
