If it's just a DNAT forwarding for the incoming packet, I don't think LVS host has to keep the status of the connection. I am probably wrong, just by curious. And I will test for it.
Thanks. Martin Wheldon wrote: > Hi, > > Because there will be no entry in the NAT table on the second host so > it won't know how to deal with the return packet. > > Best Regards > > Martin > > On 2015-02-02 09:06, Yonghua Peng wrote: >> Can you tell me why the realserver should use host A as the gateway? >> since host A and B have the same configure, and share the same VIP, I >> was thinking both A and B can be setup as the gateway. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Ivan Havlicek wrote: >>> No, if a transaction start via LVS host A, the realserver need to >>> use >>> this host as gateway to respond. >>> This is the normal for a NAT. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: >> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ >> >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - >> lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org >> Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users >> >> !DSPAM:31,54cf3dce101351953215296! > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users