Hello,

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Phillip Moore wrote:

> Has any thought been giving to making the multicast address IPVS sync
> daemons use to sync state be configurable?
> 
> 224.0.0.81 is in the link local multicast subnet. Our hope is to have
> the IPVS directors be distributed in multiple L3 networks so the
> multicast traffic would have to  be routed between them. This wouldn't
> be a problem except for the choice of this link-local subnet is
> treated specially by network vendors. Routing devices do not want to
> route this and according to my network folks it would cause it to hit
> the control plane and cause excessive usage on the routers where an
> alternate multicast subnet would not.
> 
> Looking at the code it would appear some what trivial to change this
> to a proc setting but I do not know the context or history of the
> choice behind 224.0.0.81 as the address to be hard coded.
> Interestingly the IANA assignments document shows the .81 address as
> being in a reserved range.
> 
> Our configuration idea is to have a small pool of directors all acting
> as master and backup (running both daemons). We will anycast with
> BGP/exabgp the VIP addresses to live on all of the directors which
> would live on several subnets.
> 
> I appreciate any thoughts or feedback on this idea or experiences with
> using the existing address at scale.

        I planned a change for sync code to configure message
size. But waited the merge window, so I can try this weekend
to implement also this feature: IP, PORT, TTL, the
224.0.0.81:8848/1 being default. As Simon suggests, may be
with new attributes for the IPVS_CMD_ATTR_DAEMON message.
I can try it to support IPv6 too.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <j...@ssi.bg>

_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

Reply via email to