Am 07.08.2015 10:47 schrieb "Eric Robinson" <eric.robin...@psmnv.com>: > > The thing that confuses me at the moment is the required product mix if I use keepalived. Right now I'm using the Corosync+Pacemaker+LVS+lidirectord stack. If I switch to keepalived, how much does that replace, and why? From reading the keepalived docs (which appear to be a decade old) it would seem that keepalived wants to be a do-it-all solution, so I guess I'd have to throw away what I know about Corosync and Pacemaker? And is HAproxy really necessary?
Are you talking about standalone loadbalancers, or some kind of mixed setup on the servers themselves? For standalone loadbalancers keepalived (with VRRP for IP takeover) is all you need, maybe augmented with conntrackd for nonloadbalanced connection sync / failover takeup. best regards Patrick _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
