[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23-11-2005 11:31:30: > A better solution would be to increase the returned resolution, but > this would then require a change to the sys_timeout structure to add > a member for the parts of a millisec, or go through the entire code > base changing all the timeout values to the higher resolution.
Well the amount of affected code is probably rather small since this is only used by the sequential API. It wouldn't affect the 'lwip/core' but it might break some userland/contrib code. I'll note this as a change request. Is there somebody looking after (maintaining) the sequential API nowadays? BTW: I'm not so fond of the sequential API since it's a lousy approximation of the BSD sockets interface. Bye, Christiaan Simons Hardware / Software Engineer Axon Digital Design +31 (0)13 511 66 66 +31 (0)13 511 41 51 http://www.axon.tv This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
