Pedro Alves wrote: > Yep, that's right. Any change of getting it into cvs?
I'm not sure if this is 100% correct. pbuf_free() does not guarantee the pbuf-chain is fully freed, it may also lower some reference counters, or free the chain partially. Sometimes multiple calls to pbuf_free in a loop maybe required. Setting the pointer to NULL without checking the return value of pbuf_free might actually result in a leak. Maybe the actual problem is in where an assumption/evaluation is made on the pointer value where it is used. Christiaan Simons Hardware Designer Axon Digital Design http://www.axon.tv _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
