Are you using XMK as your operating system? I had some threading issues
if I used XMK calls to create new threads rather than the lwIP
sys_thread_new() function. I may be way off here, but it is worth
checking out.
--Bill
Lachlan Grogan wrote:
Hey All,
I have encountered an issue, not to sure if it is my poor coding, a
limitation of lwip, or one of these memory alignment issues i've been
reading about.
I have the following example code:
void foo_bar()
{
struct netif * default_netif;
.... Init Code Goes Here
default_netif = netif_add(......)
... more code goes here.
}
This works fine and my system is up and operational. However I wish
to do the following:
struct netif * default_netif;
void foo_bar()
{
.... Init Code Goes Here
default_netif = netif_add(......)
... more code goes here.
}
This code does not work, netif_add(..) does not return, and crashes my
MicroBlaze.
It is far superior for me to have the pointer to the netif "global" so
as other functions can make use of it.
Can anyone suggest a solution, or see anything stupid that im doing?
Kind Regards
Lachlan Grogan.
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
