On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:03:04PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Jonathan Larmour wrote: > [big ker-snip] > > Actually I allowed myself to lose focus about what's really under > discussion. There are multiple issues in play here. Christian does have a > scenario in which the !SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT might be useful. In that case, > the code should stay and that discussion can end.
...and be commented so that there isn't the same confusion in six months time about whether it is useful! Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
