As you could see on Adam Dunkels site http://www.sics.se/~adam/uip/ <http://www.sics.se/~adam/uip/> : lwIP is "More powerful but larger embedded TCP/IP stack for microcontrollers" than uIP. About tun/tap no idea (I only use lwIP)... ==================================== Frédéric BERNON HYMATOM SA Chef de projet informatique Microsoft Certified Professional Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr <http://www.hymatom.fr/> ==================================== P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Michael
Ambrus
Envoyé : lundi 2 avril 2007 12:00
À : [email protected]
Objet : [lwip-users] lwIP or uIP ?
Hello,
I'm new both to this list and lwIP/uIP. Both lwIP and uIP seem to be
adressing embedded TCP/IP and I'm confured about which one would be best to use.
* What is the difference between lwIP and uIP and what is either ones
advantage or disadvatage compared to each other?
* Does both projects support tun/tap (if used on systems that have
tun/tap i.e.)?
Regards
/Michael
<<attachment: image001.jpg>>
<<attachment: image002.jpg>>
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:BERNON;Frédéric;;M. FN:Frédéric BERNON ORG:HYMATOM SA;Recherche et Développement TITLE:Chef de projet informatique TEL;WORK;VOICE:04-67-87-61-10 TEL;WORK;FAX:04-67-70-85-44 ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;23;Zone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan;VENDARGUES;;34740;FRANCE; LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:23=0D=0AZone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan=0D=0AVENDARGUES 34740=0D= =0AFrance URL;WORK:http://www.hymatom.fr ROLE:Chef de projet informatique EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20020404T083210Z END:VCARD
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
