Ok, so, I propose to decide that lwIP internal features are not designed to be 
used directly by application like sys_timeout (see 
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?1902, comment#28).
 
 
 
  
====================================
Frédéric BERNON 
HYMATOM SA 
Chef de projet informatique 
Microsoft Certified Professional 
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr <http://www.hymatom.fr/>  
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
 

        -----Message d'origine-----
        De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de 
Goldschmidt Simon
        Envoyé : samedi 19 mai 2007 10:54
        À : [email protected]
        Objet : WG: RE : [lwip-users] lwIP Manual
        
        

        I'd like that idea of Frédéric and me go in: accessing sockets from
        multiple threads. I'll create a bug-tracker item for it. I don't know if
        it changes the API, but it will certainly break ports.
        Other than that, there's
        - the timestamp thing (big change)
        - the etharp/ip_frag thing (no ports change, only internal)
        - Also I'd like to put a little time into a "code-review" of the
        sequential API, I think there are still some pitfalls (should I make
        that a task?).
        - Integrating checksum-on-copy would be a huge benefit for the next
        release (the user gets better performance at least for TCP send "for
        free").
        - Integrating support for MACs that support on-the-fly byte-order
        conversion is considered low by me
        
        In general, I think as there's no real time pressure, I'd like all
        currently listed tasks to go in ;-)
        
        Simon
        
        -----Originalnachricht-----
        Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        An: Mailing list for lwIP users
        Gesendet: 18.05.2007 17:57
        Betreff: Re: RE : [lwip-users] lwIP Manual
        
        On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 17:45 +0200, Frédéric BERNON wrote:
        > Kieran,
        >
        > Because lot of things change these last months, with lot of new
        > options, I think that will be good to define what tasks/bugs/items
        > have to be closed for the next release, and when this release will be
        > stopped, we could do the documentation.
        
        OK.  I think in general terms for the next release I'd like to
        prioritise anything we foresee that will alter any of our APIs.  We've
        already made a number of changes recently that will break ports.  I'd
        rather get all the port-breakage we think we need into this release, and
        then any future releases would be less painful for the porters.
        
        To this end, it would be a great help if all these issues were in the
        savannah task/patch/bug system.  If anyone knows or can think of
        anything that should be in there and is not, please add it.
        
        I should come up with a way to mark the tasks/patches/bugs that we want
        to fix for the release, and then magic some spare time to let me do
        it! 
        
        There is also little clamour from users to get the recent stuff into a
        stable form for use, so we needn't hurry a release out.  We can afford
        to take our time, fix more bugs, and get some more of the tasks done.
        
        Leon has volunteered to help with the actual mechanics of the release as
        he has some experience of it, which would be very helpful, but we're not
        there yet.
        
        There will of course need to be a couple of release candidates, together
        with testing, to make sure we don't release something unusable by
        others.
        
        Kieran
        
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        lwip-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
        

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.jpg>>

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:BERNON;Frédéric;;M.
FN:Frédéric BERNON
ORG:HYMATOM SA;Recherche et Développement
TITLE:Chef de projet informatique
TEL;WORK;VOICE:04-67-87-61-10
TEL;WORK;FAX:04-67-70-85-44
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;23;Zone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan;VENDARGUES;;34740;FRANCE;
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:23=0D=0AZone Industrielle=0D=0A175 rue de Massacan=0D=0AVENDARGUES 34740=0D=
=0AFrance
URL;WORK:http://www.hymatom.fr
ROLE:Chef de projet informatique
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20020404T083210Z
END:VCARD
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to