Its bsd style socket api .Instead of comparing the current implementation with mine in terms of speed i would like them to be compared interms of simplicity. I think the current lwip bsd api layer is complex. But thats my thinking and i may be wrong . The crux is that by implementing my own layer i have got more control and faith in lwip core .
----- Original Message ----- From: "Goldschmidt Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:40 AM Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Sys_timeouts > > > Though it takes time to make your own Sequential API layer > > but it gives you choice to make a robust interface depending > > on your needs and requirements. > > I dont know but its my feeling that current sequential > > interface is a bit slow ,i may be wrong . By implementing my > > own layer i have achieved more than 40Mbps full duplex > > communication with windows and linux servers on a 100 Mbps > > Hm, that's interesting! What kind of API did you implement? > A socket-like API? And do you have any idea how fast your > platform is with the lwip-socket API? > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
