*>> So, is there a clear rule about how we should do it?* its not about rule, its all about the effectiveness of your implementation. Its always a better implementation, to update a ARP table, as and when the packets come. But u dont pass it on to the IP layer,since the destination IP address is different.
There is always a possibility of exchanging the messages within the sub-net. This method saves one ARP query when needed. Hope you got the idea. kiran. On 2/12/09, dogeye <chetanghu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I think on RFC826, it said we should drop it if it's not for us, > but I think somewhere else mentioned we can save it in the ARP table > for furture use, and I think current lwip is doing this. So, is there > a clear rule about how we should do it? > > Thank you very much. > > > Dogeye > > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > lwip-users@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > -- Regards, Kirankumar K B M: 9923009398
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
