On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:05 -0400, Luke Trowbridge wrote: > Yet, I suppose I am still somewhat > convinced that I have setup something incorrectly. The inefficiency > of such > an algorithm (Nagle's) seems mind-boggling.
Nagle's algorithm and the delayed ACK algorithm were both developed at around the same time, and interact badly. There are ways to work around this, but none of them are perfect. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
