Hi Simon,
Am 08.05.2010 10:30, schrieb goldsi...@gmx.de:
Being like that, we could also add another function for
low_level_remove() instead of re-using the init function.
I think this is a clear and traceable solution.
The question is whether many people need it because it adds to the
code size...
I cannot speak for all but in my case is the following szenario. I have
a device with a battery power supply. The network interface with the
lwIP is "only" the communication interface if the device is connected to
its charging station or a other local network. In the other cases is my
main goal to safe power to offer the original function as long as
possible. Also it is necessary for me to reduce the power consumption.
The close of the network interface and the close of the lwIP frees any
also my limited resources.
The main impact would be that we would have to add a new parameter to
netif_remove().
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Christian Steffen
--
+++ Hensel Elektronik GmbH
+++ Hinrichsdorfer Straße 7c
+++ 18146 Rostock
+++
+++ phone +49 381 659 13 18
+++ fax +49 381 659 13 28
+++ email christian.stef...@hensel-elektronik.de
+++ web www.hensel-elektronik.de
+++
+++ Hensel Elektronik GmbH
+++ Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung
+++ Sitz der Gesellschaft: Rostock
+++ HRB 547 Amtsgericht Rostock
+++ Geschäftsführer: Hans-Joachim Hensel
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
